Jump to content
Main menu
Navigation
  • Main page
  • Contents
  • Current events
  • Random article
  • About Wikipedia
  • Contact us
Contribute
  • Help
  • Learn to edit
  • Community portal
  • Recent changes
  • Upload file
  • Special pages
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia
Search
  • Donate
  • Create account
  • Log in
  • Donate
  • Create account
  • Log in
Pages for logged out editors learn more
  • Contributions
  • Talk

Contents

  • (Top)
  • 1 Background
    • 1.1 Associated Press
    • 1.2 White House press corps
    • 1.3 Gulf of America
    • 1.4 Removal from press pool
  • 2 Legal proceedings
  • 3 See also
  • 4 References
  • 5 Further reading

Associated Press v. Budowich

Add links
  • Article
  • Talk
  • Read
  • Edit
  • View history
Tools
Actions
  • Read
  • Edit
  • View history
General
  • What links here
  • Related changes
  • Upload file
  • Permanent link
  • Page information
  • Cite this page
  • Get shortened URL
  • Download QR code
Print/export
  • Download as PDF
  • Printable version
In other projects
  • Wikidata item
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2025 pending federal court case regarding the White House's ban on Associated Press reporters

Associated Press v. Budowich
Seal of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
CourtUnited States District Court for the District of Columbia
Full case name The Associated Press v. Taylor Budowich, Karoline Leavitt, and Susie Wiles
StartedFebruary 21, 2025; 48 days ago (2025-02-21)
Docket nos.1:25-cv-00532
DefendantsTaylor Budowich, Karoline Leavitt, Susie Wiles
PlaintiffAssociated Press
Court membership
Judge sittingTrevor N. McFadden
Keywords
  • Freedom of the press
  • Due Process Clause

Associated Press v. Budowich is a pending court case before Judge Trevor N. McFadden of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia concerning the decision by President Donald Trump's White House staff to bar the Associated Press (AP) from certain press events until the AP agrees to refer to the Gulf of Mexico as the "Gulf of America".

Background

[edit]

Associated Press

[edit]

The AP counts many of the largest newspapers and broadcasters in the United States as members, and many more subscribe to the AP's wire reports. The AP Stylebook has been the American journalism industry's authoritative style guide for English grammar and terminology since the 1950s.[1][2][3] Conservative allies of President Trump have criticized the Stylebook of bias for recent changes emphasizing inclusive language.[4]

White House press corps

[edit]

The White House press corps attends news briefings and other events at the White House to provide public visibility into executive branch activities. As part of its reporting on government affairs, the AP has participated in the press corps since its creation.[3] In 1977, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Sherrill v. Knight that the White House had a limited right to deny a press pass based on "an explicit and meaningful standard", provided that they "afford procedural protections".[5] In 2018, during the first Trump administration, the White House revoked CNN reporter Jim Acosta's press pass, but a judge ordered him reinstated on Fifth Amendment Due Process grounds.[4]

Gulf of America

[edit]

On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14172, directing the federal government to redesignate the Gulf of Mexico as the "Gulf of America", a name that had not previously referred to the gulf, and Denali as "Mount McKinley". Private entities are not legally required to follow the federal government's use of these names.[6] On January 23, 2025, the AP announced that their wire reports would continue to refer to Gulf of Mexico by its traditional name while acknowledging the Trump administration's choice to use "Gulf of America". The AP's rationale is that the wire reports are used by customers around the world who would be unable to intuit "Gulf of America" without further explanation. In a concession to the Trump administration, the AP simultaneously adopted "Mount McKinley" on the basis that the mountain's name is a domestic matter over which the federal government has clear authority.[1][7]

Removal from press pool

[edit]

On February 11, 2025, the White House Office indefinitely barred AP reporters from attending press pool events, such as press briefings in the Oval Office or aboard Air Force One. AP reporters would retain their press passes, and AP photographers would continue to have full access. Deputy Chief of Staff Taylor Budowich characterized the agency's continued references to the Gulf of Mexico as misinformation and announced that reporters from a different agency would take the AP's place.[8][9][10] At a news conference, President Trump stated that the ban would stay in place until the AP agrees to use "Gulf of America" as the gulf's name.[11] In a legal filing, the White House later confirmed that President Trump personally made the decision to revoke the AP's access.[12]

AP executive editor Julie Pace condemned the ban as a violation of freedom of the press.[13] The White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA) and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press petitioned the White House to reinstate the AP. More than 50 news organizations signed one or both petitions,[14] including conservative-leaning outlets Fox News, Newsmax, and The Wall Street Journal.[15][16] Reuters,[17][13] Newsmax,[15] the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression,[1] and the National Press Club[15] also issued separate statements in support of the AP, criticizing the ban.

On February 25, 2025, the White House announced that the WHCA would no longer determine which outlets have access to the president. Breaking with tradition, they would continue to exclude the AP while making Bloomberg News and Reuters share a single seat for wire services, and the resulting two openings would go to outlets of the White House's choosing.[18]

Legal proceedings

[edit]

On February 21, 2025, the AP sued Budowich, along with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. The complaint alleges that, by singling out the AP for its editorial decisions, White House officials are violating the Constitution's First Amendment, which guarantees the freedom of the press, and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.[19][20] The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and assigned to Judge Trevor N. McFadden. In a hearing on February 24, 2025, Judge McFadden denied the AP's motion for a temporary restraining order.[11] A hearing for a preliminary injunction was initially set for March 20, 2025. However, due to factual disputes, the preliminary injunction hearing was moved from March 20 to March 27, 2025, at 9:30 AM, with each side allowed up to two live witnesses and one hour for direct examination.[21]

The White House Correspondents' Association and Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press have filed amicus curiae briefs in support of the AP.[22][23]

On March 3, 2025, the AP amended its complaint, nearly doubling the size of the document. The amended complaint leads with a quote from an unnamed White House advisor speaking to Axios on February 25: "The AP and the White House Correspondents Association wanted to f--k around. Now it's finding out time."[24][25]

On April 8, 2025, Judge McFadden ruled that the White House must lift the access restrictions on the AP while the lawsuit moves forward but stayed the ruling until April 13, giving the government time to file an appeal.[26]

See also

[edit]
  • Legal affairs of the second Donald Trump presidency
  • Donald Trump's conflict with the media

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Nover, Scott (February 24, 2025). "The New Trump Administration Is Doing More Than Just Policing Language". Slate. New York City. Retrieved February 24, 2025.
  2. ^ Benton, Joshua (February 13, 2025). "Trump wants news outlets to get on board with 'Gulf of America' — or else. Will they?". Nieman Journalism Lab. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Nieman Foundation for Journalism. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
  3. ^ a b Keith, Tamara; Walter, Amy (February 17, 2025). "Tamara Keith and Amy Walter on Trump's expanding executive powers". PBS News Hour (Interview). Interviewed by Bennett, Geoff. Washington, D.C.: NewsHour Productions.
  4. ^ a b Hinckley, Story (February 22, 2025). "A gulf widens between Trump and the press, with high stakes for free speech". The Christian Science Monitor. Boston. Retrieved February 26, 2025.
  5. ^ "Legal Fact Check: Can the White House pull a reporter's credentials?". YourABA. Chicago: American Bar Association. December 2018. Retrieved February 12, 2025.
  6. ^ DeSantis, Mark K.; Normand, Anna E. (January 27, 2025). Trump Administration Actions: Geographic Naming. CRS Reports (Report). Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service. p. 2. Retrieved January 27, 2025.
  7. ^ "The AP establishes style guidance on the Gulf of Mexico and Mount McKinley". Associated Press. January 23, 2025. Retrieved January 23, 2025.
  8. ^ Barr, Jeremy (February 13, 2025). "Associated Press and the White House remain in standoff over access". The Washington Post. Washington, D.C. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
  9. ^ "White House blocks AP reporter from Oval Office event over 'Gulf of America' policy". Voice of America. Washington, D.C. February 12, 2025. Retrieved February 13, 2025.
  10. ^ Stelter, Brian (February 14, 2025). "The White House bans the AP indefinitely over the use of 'Gulf of Mexico'". Atlanta: CNN. Retrieved February 14, 2025.
  11. ^ a b Grumbach, Gary; Madani, Doha (February 24, 2025). "Trump administration does not have to allow Associated Press access yet, judge rules". New York City: NBC News. Retrieved February 24, 2025.
  12. ^ Cheney, Kyle (February 24, 2025). "Trump personally decided to limit Associated Press' access to White House". Politico. Arlington County, Virginia. Retrieved February 24, 2025.
  13. ^ a b Crowley, Matthew (February 12, 2025). "The AP kept the name Gulf of Mexico; White House barred reporters from events over it". St. Petersburg, Florida: Poynter Institute. Retrieved February 16, 2025.
  14. ^ "Media coalition to White House: Restore AP access to press pool". Washington, D.C.: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. February 20, 2025. Retrieved February 24, 2025.
  15. ^ a b c Johnson, Ted (February 20, 2025). "Fox News And Newsmax Among News Outlets Urging White House To Lift Ban On Associated Press Over Continued References To 'Gulf of Mexico'". Deadline Hollywood. Los Angeles. Retrieved February 20, 2025.
  16. ^ Darcy, Oliver (February 19, 2025). "AP's Back-Channel Press". Status. Retrieved February 21, 2025.
  17. ^ Goudsward, Andrew (February 24, 2025). "US judge allows Trump's AP Oval Office ban to stand over Gulf of Mexico name". London: Reuters. Retrieved February 24, 2025.
  18. ^ Stokols, Eli (February 25, 2025). "White House seizes control of press pool, will decide which outlets cover events with president". Politico. Arlington County, Virginia. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
  19. ^ Folkenflik, David (February 21, 2025). "AP sues Trump White House for denying access over 'Gulf of Mexico' row". NPR. Washington, D.C. Retrieved February 21, 2025.
  20. ^ Schonfeld, Zach (February 21, 2025). "AP sues over White House access restrictions". The Hill. Washington, D.C. Retrieved February 21, 2025.
  21. ^ "ASSOCIATED PRESS v. BUDOWICH, 1:25-cv-00532 - CourtListener.com". CourtListener. Retrieved March 28, 2025.
  22. ^ Caputo, Marc; Doherty, Erin; Gibson, Brittany (February 24, 2025). "Judge upholds Trump's right to block AP for now". Axios. Arlington County, Virginia. Retrieved February 24, 2025.
  23. ^ "The Associated Press v. Budowich". Washington, D.C.: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. February 24, 2025. Retrieved February 24, 2025.
  24. ^ Betts, Anna (March 4, 2025). "AP files amended complaint against White House over press pool ban". The Guardian. Retrieved March 4, 2025.
  25. ^ "Amended Complaint" (PDF). CourtListener. Retrieved March 4, 2025.
  26. ^ Goudsward, Andrew (April 8, 2025). "Judge lifts Trump White House restrictions on AP while lawsuit proceeds". Reuters. Retrieved April 8, 2025.

Further reading

[edit]
  • AP v. Budowich (D.D.C. 21 February 2025), Text.
  • Associated Press v. Budowich court docket on CourtListener
  • v
  • t
  • e
United States First Amendment case law
Establishment Clause
Public displays
and ceremonies
  • Marsh v. Chambers (1983)
  • Lynch v. Donnelly (1984)
  • Board of Trustees of Scarsdale v. McCreary (1985)
  • County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union (1989)
  • Van Orden v. Perry (2005)
  • McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union (2005)
  • Pleasant Grove City v. Summum (2009)
  • Salazar v. Buono (2010)
  • Town of Greece v. Galloway (2014)
  • American Legion v. American Humanist Association (2019)
Statutory religious
exemptions
  • Walz v. Tax Comm'n of the City of New York (1970)
  • California v. Grace Brethren Church (1982)
  • Bob Jones University v. United States (1983)
  • Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc. (1985)
  • Corp. of Presiding Bishop v. Amos (1987)
  • Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock (1989)
  • City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)
  • Cutter v. Wilkinson (2005)
Public funding
  • Cochran v. Board of Education (1930)
  • Everson v. Board of Education (1947)
  • Flast v. Cohen (1968)
  • Board of Ed. of Central School Dist. No. 1 v. Allen (1968)
  • Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
  • Tilton v. Richardson (1971)
  • Lemon v. Kurtzman II (1973)
  • Levitt v. Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty (1973)
  • Hunt v. McNair (1973)
  • Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist (1973)
  • Sloan v. Lemon (1973)
  • Wheeler v. Barrera (1974)
  • Public Funds for Public Schools v. Marburger (1974)
  • Meek v. Pittenger (1975)
  • Roemer v. Board of Public Works of Maryland (1976)
  • Wolman v. Walter (1977)
  • New York v. Cathedral Academy (1977)
  • Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Regan (1980)
  • Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State (1982)
  • Mueller v. Allen (1983)
  • School Dist. of Grand Rapids v. Ball (1985)
  • Aguilar v. Felton (1985)
  • Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind (1986)
  • Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District (1993)
  • Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. v. Grumet (1994)
  • Agostini v. Felton (1997)
  • Mitchell v. Helms (2000)
  • Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)
  • Arizona Christian Sch. Tuition Org. v. Winn (2011)
  • Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer (2017)
  • Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue (2020)
  • Carson v. Makin (2022)
Religion in
public schools
  • McCollum v. Board of Education (1948)
  • Zorach v. Clauson (1952)
  • Engel v. Vitale (1962)
  • Abington School District v. Schempp (1963)
  • Epperson v. Arkansas (1968)
  • Stone v. Graham (1980)
  • Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)
  • Edwards v. Aguillard (1987)
  • Westside Community Board of Ed. v. Mergens (1990)
  • Lee v. Weisman (1992)
  • Santa Fe Ind. School Dist. v. Doe (2000)
  • Elk Grove Unif. School Dist. v. Newdow (2004)
  • Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. (2022)
Private religious speech
  • Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School Dist. (1993)
  • Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette (1995)
  • Rosenberger v. Univ. of Virginia (1995)
  • Good News Club v. Milford Central School (2001)
  • Shurtleff v. City of Boston (2022)
  • Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. (2022)
Internal church affairs
  • Watson v. Jones (1872)
  • Gonzalez v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila (1929)
  • United States v. Ballard (1944)
  • Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral (1952)
  • Kreshik v. St. Nicholas Cathedral (1960)
  • Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church (1969)
  • Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich (1976)
  • Jones v. Wolf (1979)
  • Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan v. Acevedo Feliciano (2020)
Taxpayer standing
  • Flast v. Cohen (1968)
  • Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State (1982)
  • Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation (2007)
  • Arizona Christian Sch. Tuition Org. v. Winn (2011)
Blue laws
  • McGowan v. Maryland (1961)
  • Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley (1961)
  • Braunfeld v. Brown (1961)
  • Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc. (1985)
Other
  • Torcaso v. Watkins (1961)
  • McDaniel v. Paty (1978)
  • Harris v. McRae (1980)
  • Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc. (1982)
  • Larson v. Valente (1982)
  • Bowen v. Kendrick (1988)
  • Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization (1989)
  • Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. v. Grumet (1994)
  • Trump v. Hawaii (2018)
Free Exercise Clause
  • Reynolds v. United States (1879)
  • Davis v. Beason (1890)
  • Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940)
  • Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940)
  • Jamison v. Texas (1943)
  • Murdock v. Pennsylvania (1943)
  • United States v. Ballard (1944)
  • Tucker v. Texas (1946)
  • Niemotko v. Maryland (1951)
  • Kunz v. New York (1951)
  • Fowler v. Rhode Island (1953)
  • Braunfeld v. Brown (1961)
  • Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market of Massachusetts, Inc. (1961)
  • Torcaso v. Watkins (1961)
  • Sherbert v. Verner (1963)
  • Cruz v. Beto (1972)
  • Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)
  • McDaniel v. Paty (1978)
  • Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. (1981)
  • Thomas v. Review Board (1981)
  • United States v. Lee (1982)
  • Bob Jones University v. United States (1983)
  • Bowen v. Roy (1986)
  • Goldman v. Weinberger (1986)
  • O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz (1987)
  • Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security (1989)
  • Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization (1989)
  • Employment Division v. Smith (1990)
  • Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah (1993)
  • Watchtower Society v. Village of Stratton (2002)
  • Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018)
  • Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo (2020)
  • Tandon v. Newsom (2021)
  • Fulton v. City of Philadelphia (2021)
  • Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. (2022)
  • Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission (2025)
Exclusion of religion
from public benefits
  • Locke v. Davey (2004)
  • Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer (2017)
  • Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue (2020)
  • Carson v. Makin (2022)
Ministerial exception
  • NLRB v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago (1979)
  • Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC (2012)
  • Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru (2020)
Statutory religious exemptions
RFRA
  • Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal (2006)
  • Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014)
  • Zubik v. Burwell (2016)
  • Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania (2020)
  • Tanzin v. Tanvir (2020)
RLUIPA
  • Sossamon v. Texas (2011)
  • Holt v. Hobbs (2015)
  • Ramirez v. Collier (2022)
Freedom of speech (portal)
Unprotected
speech
Incitement
and sedition
  • Alien and Sedition Acts (1798)
  • Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten (S.D.N.Y. 1917)
  • Schenck v. United States (1919)
  • Debs v. United States (1919)
  • Abrams v. United States (1919)
  • Gitlow v. New York (1925)
  • Whitney v. California (1927)
  • Fiske v. Kansas (1927)
  • Dennis v. United States (1951)
  • Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Bd. (1955; 1961)
  • Yates v. United States (1957, clear and present danger)
  • Bond v. Floyd (1966)
  • Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969, imminent lawless action)
  • Hess v. Indiana (1973)
Defamation and
false speech
  • New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964)
  • Hustler Magazine v. Falwell (1988)
  • United States v. Alvarez (2012)
  • Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus (2014)
Fighting words and
the heckler's veto
  • Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940)
  • Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)
  • Terminiello v. City of Chicago (1949)
  • Feiner v. New York (1951)
  • Gregory v. City of Chicago (1969)
  • Cohen v. California (1971)
  • Nat'l Socialist Party v. Village of Skokie (1977)
  • R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)
  • Snyder v. Phelps (2011)
True threats
  • Watts v. United States (1969)
  • Virginia v. Black (2003)
  • Elonis v. United States (2015)
  • Counterman v. Colorado (2023)
Obscenity
  • Rosen v. United States (1896)
  • United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (S.D.N.Y. 1933)
  • Roth v. United States (1957)
  • One, Inc. v. Olesen (1958)
  • Smith v. California (1959)
  • Marcus v. Search Warrant (1961)
  • MANual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day (1962)
  • Jacobellis v. Ohio (1964)
  • Quantity of Books v. Kansas (1964)
  • Ginzburg v. United States (1966)
  • Memoirs v. Massachusetts (1966)
  • Redrup v. New York (1967)
  • Ginsberg v. New York (1968)
  • Stanley v. Georgia (1969)
  • United States v. Thirty-seven Photographs (1971)
  • Kois v. Wisconsin (1972)
  • Miller v. California (1973)
  • Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton (1973)
  • United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film (1973)
  • Jenkins v. Georgia (1974)
  • Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad (1975)
  • Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville (1975)
  • Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc. (1976)
  • Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., Inc. (1980)
  • American Booksellers Ass'n, Inc. v. Hudnut (7th Cir. 1985)
  • People v. Freeman (Cal. 1988)
  • United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc. (1994)
  • Reno v. ACLU (1997)
  • United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. (2000)
  • City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc. (2002)
  • Ashcroft v. ACLU I (2002)
  • United States v. American Library Ass'n (2003)
  • Ashcroft v. ACLU II (2004)
  • Nitke v. Gonzales (S.D.N.Y. 2005)
  • United States v. Williams (2008)
  • American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Strickland (6th Cir. 2009)
  • United States v. Kilbride (9th Cir. 2009)
  • United States v. Stevens (2010)
  • Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass'n (2011)
  • FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2012)
  • Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton (2025)
Speech integral
to criminal conduct
  • New York v. Ferber (1982)
  • Osborne v. Ohio (1990)
  • Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002)
  • United States v. Hansen (2023)
Strict scrutiny
  • Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (2010)
  • Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015)
Overbreadth
Vagueness
  • Smith v. Goguen (1974)
  • Board of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus (1987)
  • Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky (2018)
Symbolic speech
versus conduct
  • Stromberg v. California (1931)
  • United States v. O'Brien (1968)
  • Cohen v. California (1971)
  • Spence v. Washington (1974)
  • Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence (1984)
  • Dallas v. Stanglin (1989)
  • Texas v. Johnson (1989)
  • United States v. Eichman (1990)
  • Barnes v. Glen Theatre (1991)
  • City of Erie v. Pap's A. M. (2000)
  • Virginia v. Black (2003)
Content-based
restrictions
  • Lamont v. Postmaster General (1965)
  • Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego (1981)
  • Boos v. Barry (1988)
  • Butterworth v. Smith (1990)
  • Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board (1991)
  • R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)
  • Reed v. Town of Gilbert (2015)
  • Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants (2020)
  • City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC (2022)
Content-neutral
restrictions
  • Schneider v. New Jersey (1939)
  • Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. (1986)
  • City of Ladue v. Gilleo (1994)
  • Packingham v. North Carolina (2017)
In the
public forum
  • Davis v. Massachusetts (1897)
  • Hague v. CIO (1939)
  • Thornhill v. Alabama (1940)
  • Martin v. City of Struthers (1943)
  • Niemotko v. Maryland (1951)
  • Edwards v. South Carolina (1963)
  • Cox v. Louisiana (1965)
  • Brown v. Louisiana (1966)
  • Adderley v. Florida (1966)
  • Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne (1968)
  • Coates v. City of Cincinnati (1971)
  • Org. for a Better Austin v. Keefe (1971)
  • USPS v. Council of Greenburgh Civic Assns. (1981)
  • United States v. Grace (1983)
  • Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence (1984)
  • Frisby v. Schultz (1988)
  • Ward v. Rock Against Racism (1989)
  • Burson v. Freeman (1992)
  • Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc. (1994)
  • Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York (1997)
  • Hill v. Colorado (2000)
  • McCullen v. Coakley (2014)
Designated
public forum
  • Widmar v. Vincent (1981)
  • Rosenberger v. Univ. of Virginia (1995)
  • Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski (2021)
Nonpublic
forum
  • Lehman v. Shaker Heights (1974)
  • Brown v. Glines (1980)
  • Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association (1983)
  • Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense Fund (1985)
  • International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee (1992)
  • Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes (1997)
  • Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky (2018)
Compelled speech
  • Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940)
  • West Virginia State Board of Ed. v. Barnette (1943)
  • Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo (1974)
  • Wooley v. Maynard (1977)
  • Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins (1980)
  • Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Comm'n of California (1986)
  • Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995)
  • Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, Inc. (2006)
  • National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra (2018)
  • 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis (2023)
  • Moody v. NetChoice, LLC (2024)
Compelled subsidy
of others' speech
  • Ry. Emps. Department v. Hanson (1956)
  • Machinists v. Street (1961)
  • Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977)
  • Ellis v. Railway Clerks (1984)
  • Chicago Local Teachers Union v. Hudson (1986)
  • Communications Workers of America v. Beck (1988)
  • Keller v. State Bar of California (1990)
  • Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Ass'n (1991)
  • Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliot, Inc. (1997)
  • Board of Regents of the Univ. of Wisconsin System v. Southworth (2000)
  • United States v. United Foods Inc. (2001)
  • Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass'n (2005)
  • Davenport v. Washington Education Ass'n (2007)
  • Locke v. Karass (2008)
  • Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association (2009)
  • Knox v. SEIU, Local 1000 (2012)
  • Harris v. Quinn (2014)
  • Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association (2016)
  • Janus v. AFSCME (2018)
Compelled representation
  • Steele v. Louisville & N.R. Co (1944)
  • Minnesota Board for Community Colleges v. Knight (1984)
Government grants
and subsidies
  • Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington (1983)
  • Rust v. Sullivan (1991)
  • National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley (1998)
  • Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez (2001)
  • USAID v. Alliance for Open Society International I (2013)
  • USAID v. Alliance for Open Society International II (2020)
Government
as speaker
  • Pleasant Grove City v. Summum (2009)
  • Walker v. Texas Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans (2015)
  • Matal v. Tam (2017)
  • Iancu v. Brunetti (2019)
  • Houston Community College System v. Wilson (2022)
  • Shurtleff v. City of Boston (2022)
  • Vidal v. Elster (2024)
Loyalty oaths
  • American Communications Ass'n v. Douds (1950)
  • Garner v. Board of Public Works (1951)
  • Speiser v. Randall (1958)
  • Keyishian v. Board of Regents (1967)
  • Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb (1974)
School speech
  • Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940)
  • West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)
  • Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. Community School Dist. (1969, substantial disruption)
  • Healy v. James (1972)
  • Island Trees School District v. Pico (1982)
  • Bethel School District v. Fraser (1986)
  • Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)
  • Westside Community Board of Ed. v. Mergens (1990)
  • Rosenberger v. Univ. of Virginia (1995)
  • Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. (2001)
  • Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy (2007)
  • Morse v. Frederick (2007)
  • Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski (2021)
  • Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. (2021)
Public employees
  • Pickering v. Board of Education (1968)
  • Perry v. Sindermann (1972)
  • Arnett v. Kennedy (1974)
  • Elrod v. Burns (1976)
  • Mt. Healthy City School Dist. Board of Ed. v. Doyle (1977)
  • Givhan v. Western Line Consol. School Dist. (1979)
  • Smith v. Arkansas State Hwy. Employees Local (1979)
  • Connick v. Myers (1983)
  • Rankin v. McPherson (1987)
  • Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois (1990)
  • Waters v. Churchill (1994)
  • United States v. National Treasury Employees Union (1995)
  • Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. Umbehr (1996)
  • Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. (2001)
  • Garcetti v. Ceballos (2006)
  • Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy (2007)
  • Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri (2011)
  • Lane v. Franks (2014)
  • Heffernan v. City of Paterson (2016)
  • Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. (2022)
Hatch Act and
similar laws
  • Ex parte Curtis (1882)
  • United Public Workers v. Mitchell (1947)
  • U.S. Civil Service Comm'n v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers (1973)
  • Broadrick v. Oklahoma (1973)
Licensing and
restriction of speech
  • Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Comm'n of Ohio (1915)
  • Cox v. New Hampshire (1941)
  • Murdock v. Pennsylvania (1943)
  • Kunz v. New York (1951)
  • Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (1952)
  • Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown (1957)
  • NAACP v. Button (1963)
  • Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Bar (1964)
  • Freedman v. Maryland (1965)
  • Mine Workers v. Illinois Bar Assn. (1967)
  • Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. (1981)
  • Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. (1982)
  • Riley v. Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind (1988)
  • Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement (1992)
Commercial speech
  • Valentine v. Chrestensen (1942)
  • Rowan v. U.S. Post Office Dept. (1970)
  • Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Comm'n on Human Relations (1973)
  • Lehman v. Shaker Heights (1974)
  • Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar (1975)
  • Bigelow v. Virginia (1975)
  • Virginia State Pharmacy Bd. v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council (1976)
  • Linmark Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Willingboro (1977)
  • Carey v. Population Services International (1977)
  • Bates v. State Bar of Arizona (1977)
  • In re Primus (1978)
  • Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association (1978)
  • Friedman v. Rogers (1979)
  • Consol. Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n (1980)
  • Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission (1980)
  • Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego (1981)
  • In re R.M.J. (1982)
  • Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. (1982)
  • Zauderer v. Off. of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio (1985)
  • Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Comm'n of California (1986)
  • Posadas de Puerto Rico Assoc. v. Tourism Co. of Puerto Rico (1986)
  • San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. U.S. Olympic Committee (1987)
  • Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association (1988)
  • Riley v. Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind (1988)
  • State University of New York v. Fox (1989)
  • Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of Illinois (1990)
  • City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network (1993)
  • Edenfield v. Fane (1993)
  • United States v. Edge Broadcasting Co. (1993)
  • Ibanez v. Florida Dept. of Business and Professional Regulation, Bd. of Accountancy (1994)
  • Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (1995)
  • Rubin v. Coors Brewing Co. (1995)
  • Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc. (1995)
  • 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island (1996)
  • Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliot, Inc. (1997)
  • Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Assn., Inc. v. United States (1999)
  • Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Co. (1999)
  • United States v. United Foods Inc. (2001)
  • Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly (2001)
  • Thompson v. Western States Medical Center (2002)
  • Nike, Inc. v. Kasky (2003)
  • Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass'n (2005)
  • Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy (2007)
  • Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. United States (2010)
  • Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA (2010)
  • Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. (2011)
  • Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman (2017)
  • Matal v. Tam (2017)
  • Iancu v. Brunetti (2019)
  • Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants (2020)
  • Vidal v. Elster (2024)
Campaign finance
and political speech
  • Buckley v. Valeo (1976)
  • First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti (1978)
  • California Medical Association v. FEC (1981)
  • Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley (1981)
  • FEC v. National Right to Work Committee (1982)
  • FEC v. National Conservative PAC (1985)
  • FEC v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life (1986)
  • Eu v. S.F. Cty. Democratic Cent. Comm. (1989)
  • Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990)
  • Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. FEC (1996)
  • Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC (2000)
  • FEC v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (2001)
  • Republican Party of Minnesota v. White (2002)
  • FEC v. Beaumont (2003)
  • McConnell v. FEC (2003)
  • Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. FEC (2006)
  • Randall v. Sorrell (2006)
  • FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (2007)
  • Davis v. FEC (2008)
  • Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
  • Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan (2011)
  • Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett (2011)
  • American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock (2012)
  • McCutcheon v. FEC (2014)
  • Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar (2015)
  • Thompson v. Hebdon (2019)
  • FEC v. Ted Cruz for Senate (2022)
Anonymous speech
  • NAACP v. Alabama (1958)
  • Bates v. City of Little Rock (1960)
  • Buckley v. Valeo (1976)
  • Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee (1982)
  • McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n (1995)
  • Doe v. Reed (2010)
  • Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (2021)
State action
  • Marsh v. Alabama (1946)
  • Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner (1972)
  • Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck (2019)
  • Lindke v. Freed (2024)
  • Murthy v. Missouri (2024)
Official retaliation
  • Hartman v. Moore (2006)
  • Reichle v. Howards (2012)
  • Wood v. Moss (2014)
  • Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach (2018)
  • Nieves v. Bartlett (2019)
  • Egbert v. Boule (2022)
  • Gonzalez v. Trevino (2024)
  • National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo (2024)
Boycotts
  • NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982)
  • FTC v. Superior Ct. TLA (1990)
Prisons
  • Procunier v. Martinez (1974)
  • Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Union (1977)
  • Turner v. Safley (1987)
  • Shaw v. Murphy (2001)
  • Overton v. Bazzetta (2003)
  • Beard v. Banks (2006)
Freedom of the press
Prior restraints
and censorship
  • Patterson v. Colorado (1907)
  • Near v. Minnesota (1931)
  • Lovell v. City of Griffin (1938)
  • Tucker v. Texas (1946)
  • Hannegan v. Esquire, Inc. (1946)
  • Lamont v. Postmaster General (1965)
  • New York Times Co. v. United States (1971)
  • Pell v. Procunier (1974)
  • Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart (1976)
  • Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia (1978)
  • Lowe v. SEC (1985)
  • Tory v. Cochran (2005)
Privacy
  • Time, Inc. v. Hill (1967)
  • Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn (1975)
  • Florida Star v. B. J. F. (1989)
Taxation and
privileges
  • Grosjean v. American Press Co. (1936)
  • Branzburg v. Hayes (1972)
  • Houchins v. KQED, Inc. (1978)
  • Minneapolis Star Tribune Co. v. Commissioner (1983)
  • Arkansas Writers' Project v. Ragland (1987)
  • Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. (1991)
Defamation
  • Beauharnais v. Illinois (1952)
  • New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964)
  • Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts (1967)
  • Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Ass'n, Inc. v. Bresler (1970)
  • Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974)
  • Time, Inc. v. Firestone (1976)
  • Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. (1984)
  • Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. (1985)
  • McDonald v. Smith (1985)
  • Hustler Magazine v. Falwell (1988)
  • Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton (1989)
  • Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. (1990)
  • Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox (9th Cir. 2014)
Broadcast media
  • Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC (1969)
  • FCC v. Pacifica Foundation (1978)
  • CBS, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission (1981)
  • FCC v. WNCN Listeners Guild (1981)
  • Denver Area Ed. Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. FCC (1996)
  • Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC (1997)
  • Bartnicki v. Vopper (2001)
Copyrighted materials
  • Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co. (1977)
  • Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises (1985)
  • Eldred v. Ashcroft (2003)
Freedom of assembly
Incorporation
  • United States v. Cruikshank (1876)
  • Presser v. Illinois (1886)
Protection from prosecution
and state restrictions
  • De Jonge v. Oregon (1937)
  • Thomas v. Collins (1945)
  • Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (2021)
Freedom of association
Organizations
  • Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath (1951)
  • Watkins v. United States (1957)
  • NAACP v. Alabama (1958)
  • Bates v. City of Little Rock (1960)
  • NAACP v. Button (1963)
  • Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta (2021)
Future Conduct
  • Baggett v. Bullitt (1964)
Solicitation
  • In re Primus (1978)
Membership restriction
  • Hishon v. King & Spalding (1984)
  • Roberts v. United States Jaycees (1984)
  • Rotary Int'l v. Rotary Club of Duarte (1987)
  • New York Club Ass'n v. City of New York (1988)
  • Dallas v. Stanglin (1989)
  • Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995)
  • Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000)
  • Christian Legal Society v. Martinez (2010)
Primaries and elections
  • Cousins v. Wigoda (1975)
  • Democratic Party v. Wisconsin (1981)
  • Tashjian v. Republican Party (1986)
  • Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party (1997)
  • California Democratic Party v. Jones (2000)
  • Clingman v. Beaver (2005)
  • New York State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres (2008)
  • Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party (2008)
Freedom to petition
  • United States v. Cruikshank (1876)
  • Thomas v. Collins (1945)
  • Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc. (1961)
  • NAACP v. Button (1963)
  • Edwards v. South Carolina (1963)
  • United Mine Workers v. Pennington (1965)
  • Cox v. Louisiana (1965)
  • California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited (1972)
  • Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees (1979)
  • McDonald v. Smith (1985)
  • Meyer v. Grant (1988)
  • Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation (1999)
  • BE and K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (2002)
  • Doe v. Reed (2010)
  • Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri (2011)
  • v
  • t
  • e
United States Fifth Amendment case law
  • v
  • t
  • e
United States Fifth Amendment criminal procedure case law
Grand Jury Clause
  • Hurtado v. California (1884)
  • Ex parte Bain (1887)
  • Wong Wing v. United States (1896)
  • Maxwell v. Dow (1900)
  • United States v. Moreland (1922)
  • Beck v. Washington (1962)
  • United States v. Cotton (2002)
Double Jeopardy Clause
Meaning of "same offense"
  • Blockburger v. United States (1932)
  • Grady v. Corbin (1990)
  • United States v. Felix (1992)
  • United States v. Dixon (1993)
After acquittal
  • United States v. Randenbush (1834)
  • Ball v. United States (1896)
  • Burton v. United States (1906)
  • Fong Foo v. United States (1962)
  • Ashe v. Swenson (1970)
  • Burks v. United States (1978)
  • Evans v. Michigan (2013)
  • Bravo-Fernandez v. United States (2016)
  • McElrath v. Georgia (2024)
After conviction
  • United States v. Wilson (1833)
  • Ludwig v. Massachusetts (1976)
  • Grady v. Corbin (1990)
  • United States v. Felix (1992)
  • United States v. Dixon (1993)
  • Smith v. United States (2023)
After mistrial
  • United States v. Perez (1824)
  • United States v. Jorn (1971)
  • United States v. Dinitz (1976)
  • Oregon v. Kennedy (1982)
  • Blueford v. Arkansas (2012)
Multiple punishment
  • Blockburger v. United States (1932)
Dual sovereignty doctrine
  • United States v. Lanza (1922)
  • Bartkus v. Illinois (1959)
  • Waller v. Florida (1970)
  • United States v. Wheeler (1978)
  • Heath v. Alabama (1985)
  • United States v. Lara (2004)
  • Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle (2016)
  • Gamble v. United States (2019)
  • Denezpi v. United States (2022)
Other
  • Ex parte Bigelow (1885)
  • Palko v. Connecticut (1937)
  • Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber (1947)
  • Baxstrom v. Herold (1966)
  • North Carolina v. Pearce (1969)
  • Benton v. Maryland (1969)
Self-Incrimination Clause
  • United States v. Sullivan (1927)
  • Curcio v. United States (1957)
  • Griffin v. California (1965)
  • Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
  • Boulden v. Holman (1969)
  • Williams v. Florida (1970)
  • Michigan v. Tucker (1974)
  • Edwards v. Arizona (1981)
  • Oregon v. Elstad (1985)
  • Doe v. United States (1988)
  • Illinois v. Perkins (1990)
  • McNeil v. Wisconsin (1991)
  • Mitchell v. United States (1999)
  • United States v. Hubbell (2000)
  • Dickerson v. United States (2000)
  • Chavez v. Martinez (2003)
  • Yarborough v. Alvarado (2004)
  • Missouri v. Seibert (2004)
  • United States v. Patane (2004)
  • Corley v. United States (2009)
  • Florida v. Powell (2010)
  • Maryland v. Shatzer (2010)
  • Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010)
  • J. D. B. v. North Carolina (2011)
  • Bobby v. Dixon (2011)
  • Howes v. Fields (2012)
  • Salinas v. Texas (2013)
  • Vega v. Tekoh (2022)
Due Process Clause
  • Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
  • Adair v. United States (1908)
  • Adkins v. Children's Hospital (1923)
  • Nichols v. Coolidge (1927)
  • Railroad Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Co. (1935)
  • United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938)
  • Bolling v. Sharpe (1954)
  • Schneider v. Rusk (1964)
  • Rogers v. Bellei (1971)
  • Richardson v. Davis (1972)
  • Frontiero v. Richardson (1973)
  • Department of Agriculture v. Moreno (1973)
  • Morton v. Mancari (1974)
  • Schlesinger v. Ballard (1975)
  • Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld (1975)
  • Mathews v. Eldridge (1976)
  • Hills v. Gautreaux (1976)
  • Mathews v. Diaz (1976)
  • Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong (1976)
  • Washington v. Davis (1976)
  • Mathews v. Lucas (1976)
  • Califano v. Goldfarb (1977)
  • Califano v. Webster (1977)
  • United States v. Antelope (1977)
  • Fiallo v. Bell (1977)
  • Califano v. Torres (1978)
  • Vance v. Bradley (1979)
  • Davis v. Passman (1979)
  • Califano v. Westcott (1979)
  • Harris v. Rosario (1980)
  • Harris v. McRae (1980)
  • Fullilove v. Klutznick (1980)
  • Rostker v. Goldberg (1981)
  • Heckler v. Mathews (1984)
  • Lyng v. Castillo (1986)
  • Bowen v. Gilliard (1987)
  • Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC (1990)
  • Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña (1995)
  • Miller v. Albright (1998)
  • Nguyen v. INS (2001)
  • Zadvydas v. Davis (2001)
  • Flores-Villar v. United States (2011)
  • United States v. Windsor (2013)
  • Kerry v. Din (2015)
  • Sessions v. Morales-Santana (2017)
  • Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California (2020)
  • United States v. Vaello Madero (2022)
  • Department of State v. Muñoz (2024)
Takings Clause
  • Barron v. Baltimore (1833)
  • Kohl v. United States (1875)
  • United States v. Lawton (1884)
  • Cole v. City of La Grange (1885)
  • Head v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. (1885)
  • Monongahela Nav. Co. v. United States (1893)
  • Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago (1897)
  • Peabody v. United States (1913)
  • United States v. Cress (1917)
  • Block v. Hirsh (1921)
  • Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (1922)
  • Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United States (1923)
  • Rindge Company v. County of Los Angeles (1923)
  • Leonard v. Earle (1929)
  • Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford (1935)
  • United States v. General Motors Corp. (1945)
  • United States v. Causby (1946)
  • Kimball Laundry Co. v. United States (1949)
  • United States v. Pewee Coal Co. (1951)
  • Berman v. Parker (1954)
  • Nelson v. City of New York (1956)
  • United States v. Dow (1958)
  • Armstrong v. United States (1960)
  • Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City (1978)
  • Kaiser Aetna v. United States (1979)
  • Agins v. City of Tiburon (1980)
  • Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. Beckwith (1980)
  • Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp. (1982)
  • Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff (1984)
  • Ruckelshaus v. Montanato Company (1984)
  • Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City (1985)
  • United States v. Riverside Bayview (1985)
  • Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. DeBenedictis (1987)
  • Hodel v. Irving (1987)
  • First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County (1987)
  • Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987)
  • Pennell v. City of San Jose (1988)
  • Preseault v. Interstate Commerce Commission (1990)
  • Yee v. City of Escondido (1992)
  • Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council (1992)
  • Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994)
  • Babbitt v. Youpee (1997)
  • Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (1997)
  • Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation (1998)
  • Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel (1998)
  • Palazzolo v. Rhode Island (2001)
  • Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (2002)
  • Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington (2003)
  • Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (2005)
  • San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. City & County of San Francisco (2005)
  • Kelo v. City of New London (2005)
  • Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection (2010)
  • Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States (2012)
  • Horne v. Department of Agriculture I (2013)
  • Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District (2013)
  • Horne v. Department of Agriculture II (2015)
  • Murr v. Wisconsin (2017)
  • Knick v. Township of Scott, Pennsylvania (2019)
  • Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (2021)
  • Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco (2021)
  • Tyler v. Hennepin County (2023)
  • Sheetz v. County of El Dorado (2024)
  • DeVillier v. Texas (2024)
  • v
  • t
  • e
Second presidency of Donald Trump (2025–present)
  • Previous: Biden administration
  • See also: First Trump administration
General
  • Appointments
    • ambassadors
    • attorneys
  • Cabinet
    • Vance vice presidency
  • Executive orders
  • Legal affairs
  • Opinion polling
  • Pardons
    • January 6 defendants
  • Proclamations
  • Trips
    • 2025
    • international
    • Marco Rubio
Events
Timeline
  • First 100 days
  • 2025
    • Q1
    • Q2
Speeches
  • Joint address to Congress
  • Liberation Day speech
Other
  • Transition
  • Inauguration
Policies
Domestic
  • Action against law firms
  • DEI
  • Department of Government Efficiency
    • deferred resignation
    • mass layoffs
    • targets
    • USAID
  • Dismissals of inspectors general
  • Federal funding freeze
  • Federal hiring freeze
  • Gulf of America
  • NOAA
  • Office of Shipbuilding
  • Online resource removals
  • Transgender people
  • White House Faith Office
Economic
  • Stargate Project
  • Tariffs
    • China trade war
    • Canada and Mexico trade war
    • European Union tariffs
    • "Reciprocal tariffs"
Environment
  • Paris Agreement withdrawal
Foreign
  • Expansionism
    • Canada
    • Gaza Strip
    • Greenland
  • Munich Security Conference
  • Russia–Ukraine War
    • Putin call
    • Saudi Arabia summit
    • Zelenskyy Oval Office meeting
    • minerals agreement
    • peace talks
  • Withdrawal from WHO
  • Yemen attacks
    • Signal group chat leak
Immigration
  • Deportation of immigrants
    • Deportation of Venezuelans
    • J.G.G. v. Trump
    • Deportation of Kilmar Ábrego García
  • Activist deportations
    • Mahmoud Khalil
    • Rasha Alawieh
    • Rümeysa Öztürk
  • Laken Riley Act
  • Jocelyn Nungaray National Wildlife Refuge
  • Guantanamo Migrant Operations Center
Protests
  • 50501
    • protests
  • Anti-deportation protests
  • Canadian boycott
  • Day Without Immigrants
  • Department of Justice resignations
  • Economic Blackout
  • Response to Elon Musk's role
    • DOGE lawsuits
  • People's March
  • Stand Up for Science 2025
  • Hands Off protests
Related
  • 2024 election
    • Trump campaign
  • Agenda 47
  • Anti-LGBTQ movement
  • Border crisis
  • Donald Trump and fascism
  • Kennedy Center
  • Project 2025
  • Trumpism
  • Category
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Associated_Press_v._Budowich&oldid=1284772676"
Categories:
  • 2025 in United States case law
  • United States First Amendment case law
  • United States Fifth Amendment case law
  • United States due process case law
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia cases
  • Second Trump administration controversies
  • Freedom of the press in the United States
Hidden categories:
  • Articles with short description
  • Short description matches Wikidata
  • Use mdy dates from February 2025
  • Articles containing Latin-language text
  • This page was last edited on 9 April 2025, at 16:48 (UTC).
  • Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
  • Privacy policy
  • About Wikipedia
  • Disclaimers
  • Contact Wikipedia
  • Code of Conduct
  • Developers
  • Statistics
  • Cookie statement
  • Mobile view
  • Wikimedia Foundation
  • Powered by MediaWiki
Associated Press v. Budowich
Add topic